Iran and the response to Israels aggression
Iran and the response to Israel’s aggression
TEHRAN – The Israeli regime invaded the territory of Iran on Saturday. Iran’s air defense system was targeted through this aggressive military attack. Responding to this act of aggression is Iran's inherent defense right.
While it is necessary to analyze the situation accurately, several principles should be considered. The first is the joint responsibility of Israel's supporters in this act of aggression. The second is the collective security of the nations of the region, and the third is to preserve the possibility of exiting the spiral of escalation of conflict, which is Israel's will.
1. According to the official announcements and the news broadcasted about this aggression, it seems that Israel targeted Iran's air defense system in this attack, which led to the martyrdom of four proud fighters of the country's Army. This apartheid regime had also targeted Iran's air defense system in its previous aggression against Isfahan.
The extent to which this regime has been successful in its evil intentions requires additional and accurate information that is beyond the competence and ability of this writer. However, it seems that it is thinking of continuing its aggression and is trying to weaken Iran's air defense to have more maneuverability in the event of a continuation of the conflict for the next time.
2. According to the regime's official announcement, its military operation will likely end at this stage, but this does not mean it is entirely over. Based on the record of its actions, it is likely that Israel will attempt to assassinate some individuals or carry out other sabotage activities in Iran without accepting responsibility. Therefore, Iran's intelligence system must be at a high level of vigilance.
3. Self-defense at the appropriate time is Iran's inherent right and has been internationally recognized and legitimized according to Article 51 of the UN Charter. Principally, this response must include deterrence from further aggression by the aggressor. Before and during this aggression, and specifically, afterward, the United States and the United Kingdom consistently emphasized Israel's right to self-defense.
The United States has stated that it was not present during this aggressive operation, although there are doubts about this. The United States and the United Kingdom, without condemning Israel's aggression and reaffirming its right to self-defense, have both called on Iran to refrain from responding to the aggression and to de-escalate tensions.
I suggest that in light of the responsibility of the United States in arming Israel and its comprehensive financial, military, intelligence, and political support to it, and its request to Iran, it should commit to preventing further military aggression and sabotage by Israel, including anti-security and terrorist measures against Iran, and to establish a ceasefire in the region.
As a rule, the United States, which defends Israel within the limits of its 51st state, must accept responsibility for its support for it, and a commitment must accompany its request. In this case, this measure can be considered a deterrent measure. Otherwise, this request is meaningless.
4. The countries of the region have condemned Israel's aggression against Iran’s territory with varying intensities and weaknesses. They are well aware that the expansionist idea of Zionism will include many Arab lands, and as the Persian saying goes, “It is a camel that will sleep on their doorsteps as well”.
With the participation of international and regional powers, the United Nations should take collective action to maintain the region's security. Holding a peace conference in the region under the guidance and leadership of the United Nations can be a solution.
5. Iran, as a country whose territory has been invaded, must provide all the necessary facilities to defend its territory. At the same time, the Islamic Republic should never forget diplomacy in the pursuit of military power – as it has not done, and it must always be prepared to get out of the spiral of escalation at the right time. Iran's national interest in establishing peace is entrenched. However, Israel's survival is in war and bloodshed.
source: tehrantimes.com