Irans response to Israel is definite
Iran's response to Israel is definite
TEHRAN - Kayhan’s main headline focused on Iran's definite response to Israel's attack and its importance in Western media and political circles.
It said: The Zionist regime's attack on the Islamic Republic of Iran has brought the conflict between Iran and the Axis of Resistance on one side and Israel and its Western supporters on the other to a new phase. In the power struggle between Iran and the Zionist regime, the course of developments and events has taken a very fast speed and made the situation much more complicated. The recent ‘insolence’ of this regime is a crossing of the red line that entails intelligent and deterrent action. The recent attack of the Zionist regime on Iran showed that Israel's understanding of Iran's capabilities is seriously flawed, and Iran has paid a special focus on defense in recent years in addition to offensive capability. Examining the analyses and speculations of the famous Western media shows that they expect Iran's response to any attack and they consider this issue serious. The global readiness for Iran's response shows that the world's perception of the duel between Iran and Israel is not our retreat.
Iran: Israel was unable to attack Iran without US help
In a note, the Iran newspaper addressed the dimensions of the Zionist regime's Oct. 26 attack on our country's soil and wrote: It took 26 days for the Zionist regime to estimate the damages and losses suffered from Operation True Promise II and to prepare itself for retaliatory action against Iran. The offensive power of the Zionist regime relied on fighters such as F15, F16, and F35, which were provided to the Zionist regime by the United States, and even American tanker aircraft provided fuel for its fighter jets. Even the United States helped Israel's defense system by deploying THAAD anti-missile systems in Israel. All of these cases express an obvious fact: that the Zionist regime cannot survive without America. It is the arms delivery and of course financial and more importantly diplomatic support of the United States that gives Israel the courage to spread the scope of its crimes in the West Asia region. Israel could not attack Iran without America's help.
Jam-e-Jam: The failed policy of secrecy
In an article, Jam-e-Jam wrote about the Zionist regime's secrecy regarding the casualties and injuries of its forces during the last year. It said the Zionist regime is making every effort to prevent the publication of any news about the fatalities and injuries by heavily censoring news and information. However, the media of the Islamic Republic of Iran provides clear information about any crimes committed by the Zionist regime. The secrecy behind the policy of the Zionist regime in censoring realities on the ground is a sign of the weakness of this regime and it wants to convince the public that they are the winning side of the war. In the course of this confrontation, the Islamic Republic of Iran seeks to present a real and clear picture of the war so that everyone realizes what a criminal enemy the defenseless people in Gaza and Lebanon are facing. The public opinion in the world has well understood that Israel has committed many crimes and has tried to present a victorious image of itself in this confrontation. But both inside the occupied territories and throughout the world, the voices of protests against the actions of the Zionist regime are heard.
Shargh: Three important steps in possible negotiations
In an interview with political activist Saeed Noormohammadi, Shargh discussed the impact of the American elections on the future of the Pezeshkian government. He said: The victory of Kamala Harris can be an opportunity for the government of Pezeshkian, and Trump's return to the White House only poses a greater threat to Iran than the election of the Democratic candidate. Trump's approaches and policies towards the Islamic Republic of Iran will be more dangerous, but this does not mean that the victory of Kamala Harris can lead to the start of negotiations between Iran and the United States. Three steps are necessary to start effective negotiations between the Pezeshkian government and the new government in America. The first step is to strengthen harmony, cohesion, and internal unity in the country. In the second step, Iran's regional and peripheral diplomacy should be pursued more seriously because with regional diplomacy and creating common interests, Iran's situation with its neighbors will improve. The third step is to de-escalate and start negotiations with European countries.
source: tehrantimes.com